Keywords

medieval; manuscript; fetal development; archbishop; Canterbury

Abstract

This thesis examines early medieval perspectives of fetal development by analyzing two manuscripts: British Library, Cotton Tiberius A III and Leiden University, Vossianus lat. Q69. This study will investigate how knowledge of pregnancy was shared throughout England before the establishment of universities. Interest in medieval reproductive language has piqued in importance in recent years, especially due to modern legal debates surrounding reproductive rights. By examining descriptions of the nine months of fetal development in these two manuscripts, as well as in widely known earlier medical texts like Pliny’s Natural History and Vindicianus’ Gynaecia, this research explores how monastic writers in Kent could have recorded, observed, and interpreted embryonic and fetal processes. Analysis of the relevant passages for evidence of observation and practical medical understanding suggests the possibility that the compilers had firsthand experience with pregnancy and childbirth. Key details suggest personal observation rather than direct copying of the earlier texts which reflects knowledge specifically within monastic communities and challenges the common assumptions that medieval medical writings were inaccurate or pure copies. By integrating historical analysis with modern biomedical comparisons, this study illustrates that biomedical knowledge that we hold now can help us understand historical texts and how reproductive knowledge was recorded, interpreted, and transmitted in early medieval England.

Thesis Completion Year

2026

Thesis Completion Semester

Spring

Thesis Chair

Hudson, Alison

College

College of Arts and Humanities

Department

History

Thesis Discipline

History

Language

English

Access Status

Open Access

Length of Campus Access

None

Campus Location

Orlando (Main) Campus

Share

COinS
 

Accessibility Statement

This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.

Rights Statement

In Copyright