Description
This study examined transparency and accountability as bridges to the interpretative and sense making capabilities of the public following the collapse of Crane Bank, Uganda. Content and critical discourse analysis methods were used to: investigate the nature of communication, the information shared; review honesty and responsibility in communication, and also analyze how accountability and transparency are constructed during crisis situations in the South. Assessment of 120 newspaper articles showed that both Crane Bank and Bank of Uganda mainly left it to the media to create and give meaning to stakeholders. Initial communication from both institutions was delayed and subsequent communication was made in a casual, vague and dismissive manner. Transparency and accountability either as information disclosure, responsibility or mutual understanding to translate into sense making for the audience were grossly undermined. Most of the shared information was not aligned to the interpretive capabilities of audiences; and there was no effort to create a good image or influence the audience. The research underscores the importance of transparency and accountability as essential for creating trust in leadership and management, in order to better manage crisis and risk situations.
DOI
10.30658/icrcc.2019.7
Recommended Citation
Napakol, A., & Mugunga, A. (2019). Do not bank on us! Taking stock of transparency and accountability during crises in Uganda: the case of Crane Bank collapse. Proceedings of the International Crisis and Risk Communication Conference, Volume 2 (pp. 23-26). Orlando Fl: Nicholson School of Communication and Media. https://doi.org/10.30658/icrcc.2019.7
Included in
Business and Corporate Communications Commons, Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons, International and Intercultural Communication Commons, Organizational Communication Commons, Other Business Commons, Other Communication Commons, Public Relations and Advertising Commons
Do not bank on us! Taking stock of transparency and accountability during crises in Uganda: the case of Crane Bank collapse
This study examined transparency and accountability as bridges to the interpretative and sense making capabilities of the public following the collapse of Crane Bank, Uganda. Content and critical discourse analysis methods were used to: investigate the nature of communication, the information shared; review honesty and responsibility in communication, and also analyze how accountability and transparency are constructed during crisis situations in the South. Assessment of 120 newspaper articles showed that both Crane Bank and Bank of Uganda mainly left it to the media to create and give meaning to stakeholders. Initial communication from both institutions was delayed and subsequent communication was made in a casual, vague and dismissive manner. Transparency and accountability either as information disclosure, responsibility or mutual understanding to translate into sense making for the audience were grossly undermined. Most of the shared information was not aligned to the interpretive capabilities of audiences; and there was no effort to create a good image or influence the audience. The research underscores the importance of transparency and accountability as essential for creating trust in leadership and management, in order to better manage crisis and risk situations.
