•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Health occupations (HO) teachers increasingly are required to defend their decisions in court to fail students or dismiss students from programs. Legal precedents have established several steps that HO teachers must take to protect students’ rights to both procedural and substantive due process. To justify their decisions to fail or dismiss a student, HO teachers need to take specific steps as they develop course objectives and evaluate the performance of unsatisfactory students. HO teachers often experience emotional discord when they fail or dismiss students. However, the HO teacher is bound by professional ethics to ensure that patients receive adequate care. To protect themselves and their institutions from the possibility of legal challenges, HO teachers should provide clear, unambiguous explanations of all policies, criteria, and time frames to which students are subject.

Share

COinS
 

Accessibility Statement

This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.