Title
The validity of handwriting elements in relation to self-report personality trait measures
Abstract
Research on graphology has provided mixed results regarding its validity in applied settings. Increasing popularity of this method (Edwards & Armitage, 1991) calls for continued evaluation. The current study sought to validate a popular graphoanalysis method proposed by Bunker (1979), which links specific handwriting elements to personality traits. Content-neutral handwriting of 49 college students was analyzed for 30 elements (e.g. length of t-cross) by two trained coders working independently. Participants also completed the Jackson Personality Inventory-Revised (JPI-R; Jackson, (994), which measures 15 normal personality traits. Inter-rater agreement in handwriting analysis was moderately high (median reliability = 0.80). Both predicted and non-predicted correlations between handwriting elements and JPI- R scales were significant at around chance levels (i.e. 5%). In particular, of the 119 predicted relations, only six (5.0%) were significant in the expected direction and five (4.1%) were significant in the opposite direction. All told, current findings replicate those of previous studies and suggest limited value in handwriting analysis as a predictive tool. Copyright © 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.
Publication Date
1-1-1997
Publication Title
Personality and Individual Differences
Volume
22
Issue
1
Number of Pages
11-18
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00183-3
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
0030640683 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/0030640683
STARS Citation
Tett, Robert P. and Palmer, Cynthia A., "The validity of handwriting elements in relation to self-report personality trait measures" (1997). Scopus Export 1990s. 2912.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus1990/2912