Title

Contradictions And Consensus: Youths Speak Out About Juvenile Curfews

Abstract

Juvenile curfew laws are supposed to reduce juvenile crime and victimization. Yet, current empirical evidence demonstrates that these laws are ineffective, but cannot explain why. This study examines the New Orleans juvenile curfew law through focus group discussions with youths. The focus groups were designed to determine their experiences and reactions to this law. The major dimensions explored are their knowledge of the law, compliance with the law, reactions to enforcement of the curfew, and evaluation of the law. The results show that the adolescents’ knowledge of the curfew is incomplete, disobedience is widespread, they are concerned about unfair enforcement of the law, and yet they overwhelmingly support the curfew. Further examination of the youths’ statements show that they feel unsafe and they want parents to be responsible for them and to protect them. © 1999, Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Publication Date

1-1-1999

Publication Title

Journal of Crime and Justice

Volume

22

Issue

2

Number of Pages

171-192

Document Type

Article

Personal Identifier

scopus

DOI Link

https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.1999.9721099

Socpus ID

0348046052 (Scopus)

Source API URL

https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/0348046052

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS