Title
A Comparison Of Face-To-Face And Electronic Peer-Mentoring: Interactions With Mentor Gender
Keywords
Electronic communication; Formal mentoring; Gender effects; Peer-mentoring; Self-efficacy
Abstract
The present study compared the relative impact of peer-mentoring that took place either face-to-face or through electronic chat. Protégés were 106 college freshmen randomly assigned to a senior college student mentor and to one of the two communication modes. Fifty-one mentors interacted with one of these proteges face-to-face and one solely through electronic chat. Electronic chat resulted in less psychosocial support, career support, and post-mentoring protege self-efficacy for those with male but not female mentors. Analyses of coded transcripts revealed that males condensed their language to a greater extent than did females in the electronic chat condition relative to the face-to-face condition. Dyads in the electronic chat condition had more interactive dialogue than did those in the face-to-face condition. Finally, dialogue interactivity predicted post-mentoring self-efficacy but only for those who communicated through electronic chat. © 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Publication Date
4-1-2008
Publication Title
Journal of Vocational Behavior
Volume
72
Issue
2
Number of Pages
193-206
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.004
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
40749141023 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/40749141023
STARS Citation
Smith-Jentsch, Kimberly A.; Scielzo, Shannon A.; Yarbrough, Charyl S.; and Rosopa, Patrick J., "A Comparison Of Face-To-Face And Electronic Peer-Mentoring: Interactions With Mentor Gender" (2008). Scopus Export 2000s. 10486.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/10486