Title

When Do Fair Procedures Not Matter? A Test Of The Identity Violation Effect

Keywords

fair; identity; justice; voice

Abstract

Considerable research has demonstrated that fair procedures help improve reactions to decisions, a phenomenon known as the fair process effect. However, in the present research, the authors identify when and why objectively fair procedures (i.e., receiving voice) may not always improve justice perceptions. Findings from 2 studies (Ns = 108 and 277) yield support for the proposed identity violation effect, which posits that when an outcome violates a central aspect of one's self (i.e., personal and/or social identity), objectively fair procedures do not improve procedural and distributive justice perceptions. Further, consistent with the motivated reasoning hypothesis, the Voice × Identity Violation interaction on justice perceptions was mediated by participants' tendency to find a procedural flaw-namely, to doubt that opinions were considered before making the decision. © 2009 American Psychological Association.

Publication Date

1-1-2009

Publication Title

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volume

94

Issue

1

Number of Pages

142-161

Document Type

Article

Personal Identifier

scopus

DOI Link

https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013108

Socpus ID

60349087988 (Scopus)

Source API URL

https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/60349087988

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS