Title
Interrater Reliability In Job Analysis: Differences In Strategy And Perspective
Abstract
In spite of the increasing use of the content validity model for employee selection, there has been little focused research on the psychometric properties of the job analysis ratings used to determine job content. Sources of systematic variance include differences in job performance strategies and differences in perspectives on the job. In the current study, task importance ratings for a single job (social worker) are examined to determine whether rater experience and race will have significant effects on job performance strategy and job perspectives, as measured by job analysis ratings.
Publication Date
1-1-2003
Publication Title
Public Personnel Management
Volume
32
Issue
1
Number of Pages
125-141
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600303200107
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
0037780697 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/0037780697
STARS Citation
Prien, Kristin O.; Prien, Erich P.; and Wooten, William, "Interrater Reliability In Job Analysis: Differences In Strategy And Perspective" (2003). Scopus Export 2000s. 2181.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/2181