Title
The Importance Of Representative Design In Judgment Tasks: The Case Of Résumé Screening
Abstract
A policy capturing study was conducted to determine if résumé profile judgments are generalizable to judgments of actual résumés. Forty recruiters judged 60 résumés or corresponding profiles on interview suitability. When profiles were judged, more variance in suitability judgments was accounted for, there was higher agreement among recruiters, the judgments were more favourable, and cue usage was different than when actual résumés were judged. Thus, inferences based on profiles were not generalizable to actual résumés. The importance of representative design and limitations of policy capturing for understanding résumé screening judgments were discussed.
Publication Date
6-1-2002
Publication Title
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Volume
75
Issue
2
Number of Pages
163-169
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1348/09631790260098749
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
0141942102 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/0141942102
STARS Citation
Fritzsche, Barbara A. and Brannick, Michael T., "The Importance Of Representative Design In Judgment Tasks: The Case Of Résumé Screening" (2002). Scopus Export 2000s. 2540.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/2540