Title
A Microscope Or A Mirror?: A Question Of Study Validity Regarding The Use Of Dissertation Citation Analysis For Evaluating Research Collections
Abstract
Use of dissertation citation analysis for collection evaluation was investigated. Analysis of 1842 education dissertation citations from three institutions suggests the assumption of doctoral student expertise in their use of the scholarly literature may be overstated. For purposes of developing research collections, dependence on dissertation citation analyses should proceed cautiously.
Publication Date
9-1-2004
Publication Title
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Volume
30
Issue
5
Number of Pages
347-353
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2004.06.001
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
7244229979 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/7244229979
STARS Citation
Beile, Penny M.; Boote, David N.; and Killingsworth, Elizabeth K., "A Microscope Or A Mirror?: A Question Of Study Validity Regarding The Use Of Dissertation Citation Analysis For Evaluating Research Collections" (2004). Scopus Export 2000s. 5060.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/5060