Title
Costs And Benefits Of Inducing Intrabrand Competition: The Role Of Limited Liability
Keywords
Agency theory; Channels of distribution; Free-riding; Intrabrand competition; Limited liability; Vertical contractual restrictions
Abstract
When is inducing intrabrand competition (via nonexclusive distribution) an optimal strategy? To address this issue, a static model is developed to examine two settings. The manufacturer uses exclusive distributors in the first setting and nonexclusive distributors in the second. The analysis indicates that the choice of distribution rests critically on whether the manufacturer can effectively extract surplus from the distributors. Due to a variety of institutional reasons, the distributors' liability is often limited in performing on behalf of the manufacturer; such limited liability restricts how much of the distributors' surplus can be extracted. When the distributors' surplus cannot be fully extracted, the manufacturer may prefer nonexclusive distribution even when distributors can free-ride on each other's efforts.
Publication Date
6-1-2004
Publication Title
Marketing Science
Volume
23
Issue
3
Number of Pages
-
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1040.0049
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
4944256422 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/4944256422
STARS Citation
Desiraju, Ramarao, "Costs And Benefits Of Inducing Intrabrand Competition: The Role Of Limited Liability" (2004). Scopus Export 2000s. 5166.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/5166