Title

Technological Disasters, Litigation Stress, And The Use Of Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms

Abstract

The legal system in the United States is uniquely conflict-oriented, expensive, and legalistic. From the perspective of victims, we contend that adversarial litigation is particularly ineffective as a means of resolving conflicts that typically ensue in the aftermath of technological disasters. The purpose of this paper is threefold. First, we discuss why the psychosocial impact of litigation on litigants following a technological disaster is particularly damaging. Second, examining longitudinal data collected following the Exxon Valdez oil spill, we demonstrate that the litigation process itself functions as a source of secondary trauma for litigants. Third, we provide suggestions for bypassing the litigation process altogether, via alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. Although it may be that we have exchanged swords and cudgels for subpoenas and depositions, an aura of combat continues to hover about the judicial process, and combat produces casualties. Strasburger (1999: 203). © 2004 Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.

Publication Date

1-1-2004

Publication Title

Law and Policy

Volume

26

Issue

2

Number of Pages

289-307

Document Type

Article

Personal Identifier

scopus

DOI Link

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0265-8240.2004.00013.x

Socpus ID

3042817987 (Scopus)

Source API URL

https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/3042817987

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS