Title
"Rational" Models And Values In Contentious Situations: A Case Study Of A University Budgeting Process
Keywords
Accounting information systems; Budgeting; Decision support; Financial planning; Spreadsheets
Abstract
This paper describes the value-laden and contentious budgeting process in a large university system in the southeastern US. Budgets are computed using the "Flying Horse Model," based on historical enrollment in terms of semester credit hours, a "productivity factory" for faculty in each college and national average salary by college. The model is intended to make the process more "rational" and outcomes more equitable. A new version of this model is being developed following the knowledge management system design principles of Richardson, et al. (in press) which emphasize ethical issues. The model also illustrates new decision support software designed to enhance communication among stakeholders by better visualization of model results.
Publication Date
12-1-2006
Publication Title
Association for Information Systems - 12th Americas Conference On Information Systems, AMCIS 2006
Volume
3
Number of Pages
1588-1595
Document Type
Article; Proceedings Paper
Personal Identifier
scopus
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
84870172419 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84870172419
STARS Citation
Courtney, James F. and Richardson, Sandra M., ""Rational" Models And Values In Contentious Situations: A Case Study Of A University Budgeting Process" (2006). Scopus Export 2000s. 7537.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/7537