Title

Not-For-Profit Versus For-Profit Health Care Providers - Part Ii: Comparing And Contrasting Their Records

Keywords

Compare; For profit; Not-for-profit; Performance

Abstract

The debate over which health care providers are most capably meeting their responsibilities in serving the public's interest continues unabated, and the comparisons of not-for-profit (NFP) versus for-profit (FP) hospitals remain at the epicenter of the discussion. From the perspective of available factual information, which of the two sides to this debate is correct? This article is part II of a 2-part series on comparing and contrasting the performance records of NFP health care providers with their FP counterparts. Although it is demonstrated that both NFP and FP providers perform virtuous and selfless feats on behalf of America's public, it is also shown that both camps have been accused of being involved in potentially willful clinical and administrative missteps. Part I provided the background information (eg, legal differences, perspectives on social responsibility, and types of questionable and fraudulent behavior) required to adequately understand the scope of the comparison issue. Part II offers actual comparisons of the 2 organizational structures using several disparate factors such as specific organizational behaviors, approach to the health care priorities of cost and quality, and business-focused goals of profits, efficiency, and community benefit. © 2006, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Publication Date

1-1-2006

Publication Title

Health Care Manager

Volume

25

Issue

1

Number of Pages

12-25

Document Type

Review

Personal Identifier

scopus

DOI Link

https://doi.org/10.1097/00126450-200601000-00003

Socpus ID

33646093743 (Scopus)

Source API URL

https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/33646093743

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS