Title
Aligning Collaborative And Culturally Responsive Evaluation Approaches
Keywords
Collaborative evaluation; Cultural competence; Culturally responsive evaluation
Abstract
The authors, three African-American women trained as collaborative evaluators, offer a comparative analysis of collaborative evaluation (. O'Sullivan, 2004) and culturally responsive evaluation approaches (. Frierson, Hood, & Hughes, 2002; Kirkhart & Hopson, 2010). Collaborative evaluation techniques immerse evaluators in the cultural milieu of the program, systematically engage stakeholders and integrate their program expertise throughout the evaluation, build evaluation capacity, and facilitate the co-creation of a more complex understanding of programs. However, the authors note that without explicit attention to considerations raised in culturally responsive evaluation approaches (for example, issues of race, power, and privilege), the voices and concerns of marginalized and underserved populations may be acknowledged, but not explicitly or adequately addressed. The intentional application of collaborative evaluation techniques coupled with a culturally responsive stance enhances the responsiveness, validity and utility of evaluations, as well as the cultural competence of evaluators. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
Publication Date
11-1-2012
Publication Title
Evaluation and Program Planning
Volume
35
Issue
4
Number of Pages
552-557
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.12.011
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
84861845954 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84861845954
STARS Citation
Askew, Karyl; Beverly, Monifa Green; and Jay, Michelle L., "Aligning Collaborative And Culturally Responsive Evaluation Approaches" (2012). Scopus Export 2010-2014. 4718.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2010/4718