Title
Why Girls? Using Routine Activities Theory To Predict Cyberbullying Experiences Between Girls And Boys
Keywords
cyberbullying; cybercrime; cybervictimization; gender; routine activities theory
Abstract
This study uses data from the Second Youth Internet Safety Survey (D. Finkelhor, K. J. Mitchell, and J. Wolak 2011) to predict the risk of cyberbullying between genders. Although much of the cyberbullying literature has considered gender in analyses, nearly all studies have lumped boys and girls together when examining risk factors. This gender lumping has led to the inaccurate perception that risk factors for cyberbullying affect both genders similarly. Therefore, this study fills that void by reviewing differences in the online behaviors of boys and girls, whether these differences affect risk for cyberbullying, and whether routine activities theory is applicable in explaining the risk of cyberbullying for both boys and girls. © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
Publication Date
10-1-2013
Publication Title
Women and Criminal Justice
Volume
23
Issue
4
Number of Pages
286-303
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2013.784225
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
84885400625 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84885400625
STARS Citation
Navarro, Jordana N. and Jasinski, Jana L., "Why Girls? Using Routine Activities Theory To Predict Cyberbullying Experiences Between Girls And Boys" (2013). Scopus Export 2010-2014. 6307.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2010/6307