Cacrep Accreditation, Ethics, And The Affirmation Of Both Religious And Sexual Identities: A Response To Smith And Okech
Keywords
Christian; ethics; gay; lesbian; multicultural counseling
Abstract
In response to Smith and Okech (), the authors reason that protections for sexual minorities can thrive with protections for religious liberties. The authors (a) acknowledge that the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs' accreditation process is designed to ensure that counseling programs of religious or secular institutions meet established standards to prepare counselors to work with all client groups, (b) describe the Ethical Acculturation Model (Handelsman, Gottlieb, & Knapp,), and (c) provide an example of a theological perspective for educators to help students integrate their professional and religious identities.
Publication Date
7-1-2016
Publication Title
Journal of Counseling and Development
Volume
94
Issue
3
Number of Pages
265-279
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12083
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
84973867018 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84973867018
STARS Citation
Sells, James N. and Hagedorn, W. Bryce, "Cacrep Accreditation, Ethics, And The Affirmation Of Both Religious And Sexual Identities: A Response To Smith And Okech" (2016). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 3012.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/3012