Gender, Vulgarity, And The Phantom Debates Of Chaucer'S Merchant'S Tale

Abstract

Chaucer's Merchant's Tale has long been criticized for its apparently disjunctive themes and style, yet by reading it as a series of five debates concerning gender and marriage, its organic unity comes into sharper focus. The primary sections of the tale-the marriage encomium, Justinus and Placebo's argument, May's wedding night, the mythological interlude of Pluto and Proserpina, and the tale's fabliau resolution-each highlight various aspects of the classical and medieval debate tradition, as they also foreground considerations of male and female desires within the marital realm. A sixth debate emerges in Chaucer's metatextual construction of the pilgrims' varying views of gender and marriage. As the masculinist arena of debate is regendered through the tale's unfolding, its fabliau humor envisions a world in which women can debate as persuasively as men-even through their silence.

Publication Date

1-1-2017

Publication Title

Studies in Philology

Volume

114

Issue

3

Number of Pages

473-496

Document Type

Article

Personal Identifier

scopus

DOI Link

https://doi.org/10.1353/sip.2017.0017

Socpus ID

85027464982 (Scopus)

Source API URL

https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85027464982

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS