Student Satisfaction With Online Learning: Is It A Psychological Contract?
Abstract
The authors explore the possible relationship between student satisfaction with online learning and the theory of psychological contracts. The study incorporates latent trait models using the image analysis procedure and computation of Anderson and Rubin factors scores with contrasts for students who are satisfied, ambivalent, or dissatisfied with their online learning experiences. The findings identify three underlying satisfaction components: engaged learning, agency, and assessment. The factor score comparisons indicate that students in the general satisfaction categories characterize important differences in engaged learning and agency, but not assessment. These results lead the authors to hypothesize that predetermined, but unspecified expectations (i.e., psychological contracts) for online courses by both students and faculty members are important advance organizers for clarifying student satisfaction.
Publication Date
3-1-2015
Publication Title
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network
Volume
19
Issue
2
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i2.496
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
84938841776 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84938841776
STARS Citation
Dziuban, Charles; Moskal, Patsy; Thompson, Jessica; Kramer, Lauren; and DeCantis, Genevieve, "Student Satisfaction With Online Learning: Is It A Psychological Contract?" (2015). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 77.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/77