Keywords
soft power, hard power, foreign policy, Latin America, Roosevelt, Reagan, Nye, influence, power, contra war, Good Neighbor policy;
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of soft power versus hard power in U.S. policy towards Latin America. In recent years America's unipolar moment has been challenged from populist leaders in the region to its inability to get a handle on the flow of illegal immigrants and illicit drugs that reach its shores. This thesis is a step to understanding the difference between power and influence as well as the effects of hard power and soft power in U.S. foreign policy. A historical comparative case study analysis has been conducted utilizing the cases of FDR's Good Neighbor policy and Reagan's contra war policies. This qualitative approach examined specific short-term and long-term goals of each policy and analyzed each strategy's ability to achieve those stated goals. The results of the study reveal that both soft and hard power approaches can have positive as well as negative effects on American influence in Latin America.
Notes
If this is your thesis or dissertation, and want to learn how to access it or for more information about readership statistics, contact us at STARS@ucf.edu
Graduation Date
2007
Semester
Spring
Advisor
Dolan, Chris
Degree
Master of Arts (M.A.)
College
College of Sciences
Department
Political Science
Degree Program
Political Science
Format
application/pdf
Identifier
CFE0001600
URL
http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/etd/CFE0001600
Language
English
Release Date
May 2007
Length of Campus-only Access
None
Access Status
Masters Thesis (Open Access)
STARS Citation
Weinbrenner, John, "Soft Power And Hard Power Approaches In U.S. Foreign Policy: A Case Study Comparison In Latin America" (2007). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3405.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/3405