Keywords
gay marriage, public opinion, authoritarianism, tolerance, traditionalism, gay rights
Abstract
This research aims to answer a simple question: Why are some individuals, and some states, more willing to extend protections to same-sex couples than are others? Drawing from the literature, I perform a battery of quantitative tests on variables most commonly associated with gay rights and gay marriage policy development: liberalism, education, age, religiosity, authoritarianism, tolerance, urbanization, and moral traditionalism. While I find that all of these variables have a relationship with gay rights and gay marriage opinion, I argue that those associated with religiosity have the strongest pull. However, religiosity does not act alone; moral traditionalism, age, and ideology play particularly robust roles as well. In conclusion, I contend that the data show a strong likelihood for the continued liberalization of gay rights and gay marriage policy into the foreseeable future.
Notes
If this is your thesis or dissertation, and want to learn how to access it or for more information about readership statistics, contact us at STARS@ucf.edu
Graduation Date
2010
Advisor
Pollock, Philip
Degree
Master of Arts (M.A.)
College
College of Health and Public Affairs
Department
Political Science
Degree Program
Political Science
Format
application/pdf
Identifier
CFE0003020
URL
http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/etd/CFE0003020
Language
English
Release Date
May 2010
Length of Campus-only Access
None
Access Status
Masters Thesis (Open Access)
STARS Citation
Billman, Jeffrey, "Marriage For Some: Explaining The Variation In Gay Rights And Marriage Policy And Opinion Among States And Individuals" (2010). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 4381.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/4381