ORCID

0009-0008-0325-5152

Keywords

forensic anthropology, biological normalcy, fuzzy logic, osteological sex estimation, transgender and gender diverse individuals

Abstract

Forensic anthropologists estimate assigned sex at birth from skeletal material as part of the biological profile. Methodological approaches to assigned sex estimation in forensic anthropology reinforce biological normalcy (feedback loop between research and culture that defines what is “normal”), which reifies binary biological sex. A reliance on binary sex is problematic as it 1) does not accurately reflect the variation in biological sex and 2) could hinder the identification efforts of transgender, gender diverse, and intersex individuals. The purpose of this research is to contribute to the interrogation of biological normalcy through fuzzy logic to investigate osteological sex variation and classification of assigned sex. Cranial metric and morphological data were collected from computed tomography scans of 130 assigned females at birth and 169 assigned males at birth from the New Mexico Decedent Image Database. Fuzzy clustering techniques were employed to explore whether the pre-designated categories of sex accurately reflect variation. The fuzzy clustering showed that individuals clustered into two to six, non-discrete clusters that modeled a continuum of gracility and robusticity rather than strictly assigned sex. The impact of fuzzy principles on classification was explored using fuzzy rule-based systems for the classification of assigned sex and gracility/robusticity. Generally, classification of assigned sex was comparable to traditional classification methods (76.29% - 87.63%), though the morphological models had lower overall accuracy rates. Additionally, classification accuracy was higher when predicting the structure of the data (i.e., gracility/robusticity) (87.63% - 93.81%) rather than the ascribed category of sex. Lastly, fuzzy classification models were applied to a small sample of presumed transgender individuals, who primarily classified according to their assigned sex, which underscores the importance of developing methodological approaches of assessing gender through a biocultural framework. While further research is needed, fuzzy logic offers an approach to begin deconstructing binary sex through “fuzzifying” osteological sex.

Completion Date

2025

Semester

Summer

Committee Chair

Adams, Donovan

Degree

Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

College

College of Sciences

Department

Anthropology

Format

PDF

Release Date

8-15-2027

Document Type

Dissertation

Campus Location

Orlando (Main) Campus

Subjects

Human remains (Archaeology)--Sex determination; Forensic anthropology--Methodology; Sex differences--Research; Forensic osteology; Gender identity--Research

Available for download on Sunday, August 15, 2027

Share

COinS
 

Accessibility Statement

This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.