Abstract
The value of free speech is deeply rooted in democratic principles designed to foster a marketplace of ideas where diverse viewpoints thrive and enable accountability and social progress. Simultaneously, academic freedom is essential for the pursuit of knowledge. Yet both must be exercised responsibly. This thesis examines the intricate relationship between free speech, academic freedom, and humanistic concerns like respect, inclusivity, and diversity. By exploring pivotal court cases such as Sweezy v. New Hampshire (1957), Bonnell v. Lorenzo (2001), Axson-Flynn v. Johnson (2004), Tinker v. Des Moines (1969), and Morse v. Frederick (2007), this paper illustrates the delicate balance needed in educational settings. The analysis suggests that schools should establish clear speech policies, prioritize education on responsible speech, and create committees to address speech-related concerns. An ideal policy balances court requirements, humanistic concerns, and promotes respectful dialogue while prohibiting harmful speech.
Thesis Completion
2023
Semester
Fall
Thesis Chair/Advisor
Patrick, Carlton
Degree
Bachelor of Arts (B.A.)
College
College of Community Innovation and Education
Department
Legal Studies
Degree Program
Legal Studies
Language
English
Access Status
Open Access
Release Date
12-15-2023
Recommended Citation
Marrero-Bosch, Andrea, "The Limitations of Freedom of Speech Regarding Academic Freedom: Balancing Constitutional Rights with Humanistic Responsibilities" (2023). Honors Undergraduate Theses. 1491.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses/1491