Keywords

I/O; psychometrics; measures; single-item; multiple-item; regression

Abstract

The current study examines the use of single-item measures to assess constructs used by occupational stress researchers. Surveys are fundamental tools for I/O Psychologist practitioners, and multiple-item measures are commonly used to fulfill that purpose. However, long surveys may offer challenges to both administrators and respondents. As an effort to mitigate those challenges, single-item measures have been receiving recognition as a promising alternative to the current psychometric measures due to their benefits, such as reduced cost and higher face validity. We will discuss the previous studies on single-item measures and why it’s relevant to explore its potential by performing a multiple regression analysis. We wanted to explore more about single-item measures, and therefore analyze whether the two types of measures produce different levels of criterion-related validity. To address our question, we recruited 500 employed individuals through an online tool called CloudResearch Connect. This tool allowed us to quickly collect diverse data (i.e., participants of various professions) that can be generalized and reproduced. Participants had to fill out a survey with both single and multiple-item measures as our predictor and criteria variables. The items were I/O Psychology constructs with a focus on occupational stress. Results suggested multiple-item measures to outperform single-item measures. We hope to encourage more research on the matter to further understand the relationship between both measures.

Thesis Completion Year

2025

Thesis Completion Semester

Fall

Thesis Chair

Bowling, Nathan

College

College of Sciences

Department

Psychology

Thesis Discipline

Psychology

Language

English

Access Status

Open Access

Length of Campus Access

None

Campus Location

Orlando (Main) Campus

Download

Share

COinS
 

Rights Statement

In Copyright