Abstract
This article proposes a paradigm shift in the reward system within the U.S. higher education. The thesis of the paper is that changing the reward system to respond to the current criticism of higher education being voiced in the larger society and manifest in legislative actions in reducing funds available to higher education and efforts to monitor or control certain aspects of the higher education process--accountability, outcome measures, workload studies, hours of classroom contact--to a degree that may be perceived as being micromanagement requires a paradigm shift by those who are within the academy. Typically one would think of a paradigm shift as occurring within a discipline or field. But changing the reward system in higher education will require what may be seen, metaphorically, as a paradigm shift as well.
Recommended Citation
Andersen, K. E. (1993). Scholarship reconsidered: The changing reward system. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 22(3), 9–13.
Accessibility Statement
This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.
This journal supports Open Science Badges
