Title
Subordinates' Resistance And Managers' Evaluations Of Subordinates' Performance
Keywords
Downward influence; Leader-member exchange; Performance evaluations; Resistance behavior
Abstract
The authors explored the validity of two perspectives as to how managers evaluate subordinates who resist downward influence attempts: a uniformly dysfunctional perspective (i.e., managers regard all manifestations of resistance as indicators of ineffective influence and rate subordinates unfavorably when they resist) and a multifunctional perspective (i.e., managers regard some manifestations of resistance as more constructive than others and rate subordinates more favorably when they employ constructive resistance tactics). The results of two studies provided support for an interactive model, which predicts that the uniformly dysfunctional perspective is characteristic of lower quality leader-member exchange (LMX) relationships and that the multifunctional perspective is characteristic of higher quality leader-member exchanges. © 2006 Southern Management Association. All rights reserved.
Publication Date
4-1-2006
Publication Title
Journal of Management
Volume
32
Issue
2
Number of Pages
185-209
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277801
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
33644788733 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/33644788733
STARS Citation
Tepper, Bennett J.; Uhl-Bien, Mary; Kohut, Gary F.; Rogelberg, Steven G.; and Lockhart, Daniel E., "Subordinates' Resistance And Managers' Evaluations Of Subordinates' Performance" (2006). Scopus Export 2000s. 8461.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/8461