A critical look at the views on authorship in story generation research
Submission Type
Paper
Start Date/Time (EDT)
20-7-2024 10:30 AM
End Date/Time (EDT)
20-7-2024 11:30 AM
Location
Algorithms & Imaginaries
Abstract
Computer science researchers have long been interested in generating creative texts with computers, and the development of story-generating programs has formed its own field of research, closely tied with research on computational creativity and artificial intelligence. In this presentation, I examine how authorship of computer-generated texts is approached in story generation research. I focus on the following questions: How is authorship discussed in relation to its conceptualisations in literary theory? How are the contributions and cooperation between the human author(s) and the program described in the research? The research material consists of story generation publications published during the last decade, selected based on recent reviews that discuss the state-of-the-art of story generation.
There are many, partly overlapping definitions of authorship in literary theory, such as as the romantic conceptualisation of the author as a creative genius, the institutional role of the author that is tied to print literature and copyright, as well as the author’s role as the party that is responsible for the aesthetic whole of the work. In my presentation I examine how these different aspects of authorship are present in the research material.
In electronic literature, the ambiguity of authorship is typical, as technology has made techniques such as combining and modifying existing texts considerably easier than before. Authors of electronic literature often elude disciplinary categorisations such as a poet or an engineer, and these different roles can merge. In story generation, ascribing authorship is also complicated by factors such as the design of the program, the data the program is given, as well as the program’s possible role as a co-author. My presentation is focused on how the interaction and collaboration between the program and its programmer – the machine and the human – is discussed in the research material in relation to authorship.
Recommended Citation
Alhussain, A. I., & Azmi, A. M. (2021). Automatic Story Generation: A Survey of Approaches. ACM Comput. Surv., 54(5). https://doi.org/10.1145/3453156 Ammanabrolu, P., Cheung, W., Broniec, W., & Riedl, M. O. (2021). Automated Storytelling via Causal, Commonsense Plot Ordering. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 35(7), 5859–5867. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i7.16733 Ansag, R. A., & Gonzalez, A. J. (2023). State-of-the-Art in Automated Story Generation Systems Research. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 35(6), 877–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2021.1971777 Bottoni, B., Moolenaar, Y., Hevia, A., Anchor, T., Benko, K., Knauf, R., Jantke, K. P., Gonzalez, A. J., & Wu, A. S. (2020). Character Depth and Sentence Diversification in Automated Narrative Generation. Proceedings of the 33rdd Annual Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS-2020), North Miami Beach, FL: AAAI Press. Cheong, Y.-G., & Young, R. M. (2015). Suspenser: A Story Generation System for Suspense. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games., 7(1), 39–52. Chhun, C., Colombo, P., Suchanek, F. M., & Clavel, C. (2022). Of Human Criteria and Automatic Metrics: A Benchmark of the Evaluation of Story Generation. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 5794–5836. https://aclanthology.org/2022.coling-1.509 Daza, A., Calvo, H., & Figueroa-Nazuno, J. (2016). Automatic Text Generation by Learning from Literary Structures. Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W16-0202 Fan, A., Lewis, M., & Dauphin, Y. (2018). Hierarchical Neural Story Generation. Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 889–898. Guan, J., Huang, F., Zhao, Z., Zhu, X., & Huang, M. (2020). A Knowledge-Enhanced Pretraining Model for Commonsense Story Generation. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8, 93–108. Guan, J., Zhang, Z., Feng, Z., Liu, Z., Ding, W., Mao, X., Fan, C., & Huang, M. (2021). OpenMEVA: A Benchmark for Evaluating Open-ended Story Generation Metrics. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), 6394–6407. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.500 Herrera-González, B.D., Gelbukh, A., Calvo, H. (2020). Automatic Story Generation: State of the Art and Recent Trends. In: Martínez-Villaseñor, L., Herrera-Alcántara, O., Ponce, H., Castro-Espinoza, F.A. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. MICAI 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12469. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60887-3_8 Ippolito, D., Grangier, D., Eck, D., & Callison-Burch, C. (2020). Toward Better Storylines with Sentence-Level Language Models. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 7472–7478. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.666 Jain, P., Agrawal, P., Mishra, A., Sukhwani, M., Laha, A., & Sankaranarayanan, K. (2017). Story Generation from Sequence of Independent Short Descriptions. Kybartas, B., & Bidarra, R. (2017). A Survey on Story Generation Techniques for Authoring Computational Narratives. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games., 9(3), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCIAIG.2016.2546063 Li, Z., Ding, X., & Liu, T. (2018). Generating Reasonable and Diversified Story Ending Using Sequence to Sequence Model with Adversarial Training. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 1033–1043. https://aclanthology.org/C18-1088 Liu, D., Li, J., Yu, M. H., Huang, Z., Liu, G., Zhao, D., & Yan, R. (2020) A character-centric neural model for automated story generation. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence vol 34, pp. 1725–1732, New York, NY: AAAI Press. O’Neill, B., & Riedl, M. (2014). Dramatis: A Computational Model of Suspense. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 944–950. Peng, N., Ghazvininejad, M., May, J., & Knight, K. (2018). Towards Controllable Story Generation. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Storytelling, 43–49. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-1505 Peng, X., Li, S., Wiegreffe, S., & Riedl, M. (2022). Inferring the Reader: Guiding Automated Story Generation with Commonsense Reasoning. Porteous, J., & Lindsay, A. (2019). Protagonist vs Antagonist PROVANT: Narrative Generation as Counter Planning. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, 1069–1077. Tambwekar, P., Dhuliawala, M., Martin, L., Mehta, A., Harrison, B., & Riedl, M. (2019). “Controllable Neural Story Plot Generation via Reward Shaping.” In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-19). 5982–5988. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/829 van der Lee, C., Gatt, A., van Miltenburg, E., Wubben, S., & Krahmer, E. (2019). Best practices for the human evaluation of automatically generated text. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Natural Language Generation, 355–368. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-8643 Xu, J., Ren, X., Zhang, Y., Zeng, Q., Cai, X., & Sun, X. (2018). A Skeleton-Based Model for Promoting Coherence Among Sentences in Narrative Story Generation. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 4306–4315. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D18-1462 Yao, L., Peng, N., Weischedel, R., Knight, K., Zhao, D., & Yan, R. (2019). Plan-and-Write: Towards Better Automatic Storytelling. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33, 7378–7385. Other references Aarseth, E. J. (1997). Cybertext : perspectives on ergodic literature. Johns Hopkins University Press. Ackermans, H., 2017. ‘Source Code: Linguistic, Literary, and Cultural Meaning-Making in Generative Literature.’ Thinking Through the Digital. Retrieved from: http://conference.reprecdigit.se/#/contributions/hannah-ackermans Aquilina, M. (2017, August 6). Text Generation, or Calling Literature into Question. In Electronic Book Review. Accessed 16 November 2013. https://electronicbookreview.com/essay/text-generation-or-calling-literature-into-question/ Berensmeyer, I., Buelens, G., & Demoor, M. (2019). The Cambridge handbook of literary authorship Cambridge University Press. Bolter, J. D. (1991). Writing space: the computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. In Writing space : the computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Booth, W. C., (1961/1983). The rhetoric of fiction (2. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Bootz, P. (2004). The Set of U / La Série des U. Accessed at: https://collection.eliterature.org/1/works/bootz_fremiot__the_set_of_u.html Bray, J., Gibbons, A., & McHale, B. (2012). The Routledge Companion to Experimental Literature (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203116968 Chatman, S., (1978/1993). Story and discourse: narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Eco, U., (1979). The role of the reader: explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Funkhouser, C. (2007). Prehistoric digital poetry: an archaeology of forms, 1959-1995. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. Glazier, L. P. (2013). Digital Poetics : Hypertext, Visual-Kinetic Text and Writing in Programmable Media. University of Alabama Press. Goldsmith, Kenneth. (2011). Uncreative writing: managing language in the digital age. Columbia University Press. Hayles, N. Katherine. (2008). Electronic literature: new horizons for the literary. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame. Henrickson, L., (2018). ‘Tool vs. agent: attributing agency to natural language generation systems’. In Digital Creativity (Exeter), 29(2–3), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2018.1482924 Henrickson, L., (2021). Reading computer-generated texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hongisto, T. (2023). Reading computer-generated texts: examining code as a reading strategy. Digital Creativity, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2023.2274451 Klein, S., Aeschlimann, J. F., Balsiger, D. F., Converse, S. L., Court, C., Foster, M., Lao, R., Oakley, J. D., & Smith, J., (1973). ‘Automatic Novel Writing: A Status Report.’ Tech. Report 186. University of Wisconsin, Computer Science Department. Mani, I. (2013). Computational modeling of narrative. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. Marino, M. (2020). Critical Code Studies. The MIT Press. Meehan, J. (1976). The Metanovel: Writing Stories by Computer. PhD. Dissertation. Yale University, Computer Science. Montfort, N., & Pérez y Pérez, R. (2023). Computational Models for Understanding Narrative. In Revista de Comunicação e Linguagens, 58, 97–117. Natale, S. (2021). Deceitful Media: Artificial Intelligence and Social Life after the Turing Test. Oxford University Press. Ogata, T., & Akimoto, T. (2016). Computational and Cognitive Approaches to Narratology from the Perspective of Narrative Generation. In Computational and Cognitive Approaches to Narratology, 1–74. IGI Global. Paaß, G., & Giesselbach, S., (2023). Foundation Models for Natural Language Processing: Pre-trained Language Models Integrating Media. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 19–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23190-2_2 Pemberton, L. 1989. "A modular approach to story generation”. In Proceedings of the fourth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 217–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/976815.976845 Pressman, J., Marino, M. C., & Douglass, J. (2015). Reading Project: A Collaborative Analysis of William Poundstone’s Project for Tachistoscope {Bottomless Pit}. University of Iowa Press. Rettberg, S. (2018). Electronic literature. Polity. Rimmon-Kenan, S., (1983). Narrative fiction: contemporary poetics. London: Methuen. Ryan, M.-L. (1991). Possible worlds, artificial intelligence, and narrative theory. Indiana University Press. Ryan, J. (2017). Grimes’ Fairy Tales: A 1960s Story Generator. In I. and N. V. Nunes Nuno and Oakley (Ed.), Interactive Storytelling, 89–103. Springer International Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71027-3_8 Saemmer, A. (2009). Aesthetics of surface, ephemeral, re-enchantment and mimetic approaches in digital literature. Neohelicon, 36(2), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-009-0016-2 Schmid, W., (2010). Narratology. An Introduction. Berlin: de Gruyter. Turing, A. (1950) “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind 59.236, 433– 60. Turner, S. R. (1994). The creative process: a computer model of storytelling and creativity (S. R. Turner, Ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Wardrip-Fruin, N. (2009). Expressive processing : digital fictions, computer games, and software studies. MIT Press.
A critical look at the views on authorship in story generation research
Algorithms & Imaginaries
Computer science researchers have long been interested in generating creative texts with computers, and the development of story-generating programs has formed its own field of research, closely tied with research on computational creativity and artificial intelligence. In this presentation, I examine how authorship of computer-generated texts is approached in story generation research. I focus on the following questions: How is authorship discussed in relation to its conceptualisations in literary theory? How are the contributions and cooperation between the human author(s) and the program described in the research? The research material consists of story generation publications published during the last decade, selected based on recent reviews that discuss the state-of-the-art of story generation.
There are many, partly overlapping definitions of authorship in literary theory, such as as the romantic conceptualisation of the author as a creative genius, the institutional role of the author that is tied to print literature and copyright, as well as the author’s role as the party that is responsible for the aesthetic whole of the work. In my presentation I examine how these different aspects of authorship are present in the research material.
In electronic literature, the ambiguity of authorship is typical, as technology has made techniques such as combining and modifying existing texts considerably easier than before. Authors of electronic literature often elude disciplinary categorisations such as a poet or an engineer, and these different roles can merge. In story generation, ascribing authorship is also complicated by factors such as the design of the program, the data the program is given, as well as the program’s possible role as a co-author. My presentation is focused on how the interaction and collaboration between the program and its programmer – the machine and the human – is discussed in the research material in relation to authorship.
Bio
Tuuli Hongisto is a PhD student majoring in comparative literature at the University of Helsinki. She graduated from the University of Helsinki in 2020 with comparative literature as her major (thesis topic: “Essential narrative features in story generating algorithms”). Her PhD project focuses on the topic of reader- and authorship of computer-generated texts.