Abstract
Student use of GenAI is growing and so are the faculty concerns. With research providing mixed suggestions and approaches, this study sought to understand the student perspective on ethical uses, their own motives and perceived benefits of GenAI use, the risks involved, and their perceptions of susceptibility and severity related to unethical use (i.e., plagiarism/cheating). Results revealed the complexity of student considerations regarding the uses, risks, and benefits of GenAI and its potential for personalized learning enhancement. Students generally view the likelihood of being caught submitting AI-generated work as their own as high and the consequences as severe. The viability of applying persuasive theory to ethical decision-making and HMC, as well as implications of interweaving examinations of instructor-student communication and HMC are discussed.
DOI
10.30658/hmc.11.4
Author ORCID Identifier
Jessalyn I. Vallade: 0000-0001-8972-4344 
Renee Kaufmann: 0000-0003-4522-9637
Recommended Citation
Vallade, J. I., Kaufmann, R., & Upchurch, T. (2025). “Made classes easier than a coloring sheet”: Student perceptions and uses of GenAI. Human-Machine Communication, 11, 59–79. https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.11.4
Submit Article
This journal supports Open Science Badges
