Equipping First-Year Students to Perform Double-Loop Evaluations of their Work Using AI

Alternative Title

Equipping First-Year Students to Perform Double-Loop Evaluations of their Work Using Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Contributor

University of Central Florida. Faculty Center for Teaching and Learning; University of Central Florida. Division of Digital Learning; Teaching and Learning with AI Conference (2024 : Orlando, Fla.)

Location

Gold Coast I-II

Start Date

23-7-2024 2:45 PM

End Date

23-7-2024 3:15 PM

Publisher

University of Central Florida Libraries

Keywords:

Double-loop evaluation; Artificial intelligence; Technical writing; Higher-order thinking; Student reflection

Subjects

Academic writing--Study and teaching--Evaluation; Artificial intelligence--Computer-assisted instruction; Technical writing--Evaluation; Self-evaluation--Study and teaching; Writing--Computer-assisted instruction

Description

This presentation demonstrates methods from a first-year Introduction to Technical Writing course in which students used AI tools to perform a double-loop evaluation of writing. Students generated a rubric for each assignment and then judged it according to the assignment guidelines, activating higher-order thinking. Students then input the rubric into the AI along with their own writing to let the AI evaluate their work using the AI-generated rubric. Using this double-loop feedback, students edited their writing before final submission and reflected on this process.

Language

eng

Type

Presentation

Rights Statement

All Rights Reserved

Audience

Faculty, Students

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Jul 23rd, 2:45 PM Jul 23rd, 3:15 PM

Equipping First-Year Students to Perform Double-Loop Evaluations of their Work Using AI

Gold Coast I-II

This presentation demonstrates methods from a first-year Introduction to Technical Writing course in which students used AI tools to perform a double-loop evaluation of writing. Students generated a rubric for each assignment and then judged it according to the assignment guidelines, activating higher-order thinking. Students then input the rubric into the AI along with their own writing to let the AI evaluate their work using the AI-generated rubric. Using this double-loop feedback, students edited their writing before final submission and reflected on this process.

Accessibility Statement

This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.