Alternative Title
Rubric for Grading Assignments that Explicitly Allowed Students to use Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)
Contributor
University of Central Florida. Faculty Center for Teaching and Learning; University of Central Florida. Division of Digital Learning; Teaching and Learning with AI Conference (2024 : Orlando, Fla.)
Location
Seminole A
Start Date
24-7-2024 10:45 AM
End Date
24-7-2024 11:15 AM
Publisher
University of Central Florida Libraries
Keywords:
Generative AI; Grading rubrics; Academic integrity; Evaluation metrics; Student assignments
Subjects
Grading and marking (Students)--Evaluation; Grading and marking (Students)--Standards; Artificial intelligence--Study and teaching; Academic writing--Evaluation; Grading and marking (Students)--Study and teaching
Description
Grading of assignments created with the help of Generative AI tools poses a major challenge to instructors who were trained on rubrics developed decades ago. Such rubrics are incapable of handling situations where the work is clearly a violation of honor agreements. We propose a set of metrics that may be useful for grading student work that is at least partially generated with the help of AI. The audience is encouraged to bring their own ideas as explicit feedback will be sought and will be part of the discussion.
Language
eng
Type
Presentation
Format
application/pdf
Rights Statement
All Rights Reserved
Audience
Faculty, Instructional designers
Recommended Citation
Yousuf, Muhammad Ali; Belfiore, M. Nicole; and Ali, Akbar, "Rubric for Grading Assignments that Explicitly Allowed Students to use Generative AI" (2024). Teaching and Learning with AI Conference Presentations. 17.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/teachwithai/2024/wednesday/17
Rubric for Grading Assignments that Explicitly Allowed Students to use Generative AI
Seminole A
Grading of assignments created with the help of Generative AI tools poses a major challenge to instructors who were trained on rubrics developed decades ago. Such rubrics are incapable of handling situations where the work is clearly a violation of honor agreements. We propose a set of metrics that may be useful for grading student work that is at least partially generated with the help of AI. The audience is encouraged to bring their own ideas as explicit feedback will be sought and will be part of the discussion.