Dr. Anthony Grajeda


Recent critics of Jorge Luis Borges’s “The House of Asterion” (1947) have traced the author’s revisions in the original manuscript, charting his changing arrangement of information through the text. This essay investigates the information itself through structuralist and historicist theory. A structuralist reading analyzes Asterion’s worldview and shows how various narrators dock the integrity of his voice. Historicism probes aspects of religion, biology, and architecture to limn the true complexity of Asterion’s ties with society. Together, these theories reveal a trove of intricate intrigue and doubt. In this study I examine how Asterion, a reinvention of the Minotaur, is painstakingly shaped as a tragic figure. I describe how his trap is not a labyrinth but a gross misunderstanding, one which bars him from humans trapped in their own inaccurate views. With this groundbreaking short story, Borges accounts for the Minotaur with novel explanations while challenging many facets of his myth.

About the Author

Evan Chiovari is an English Literature major at UCF. He is a former theatre major and the self-published author of Pebbleworm, a play that reimagines the myth of Peter Pan through the eyes of the Neverland crocodile. Chiovari recently founded an animation studio, where he works as the co-creator, screenwriter, and concept artist of an upcoming series. He also aspires to be a novelist and has written three children’s books currently undergoing illustration.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.