•  
  •  
 

Mentor

Dr. William Kinnally

Abstract

The global rise in human trafficking is not receiving adequate media attention. While newspaper coverage of the topic has increased, current research argues that the issue is framed with a lack of diversity, limiting audience understanding of its complexity. Some researchers also note that coverage disproportionately focuses on sex trafficking, with minimal attention directed to other forms of trafficking such as the labor or organ trade. This paper conducts a narrative literature analysis of media research on human trafficking, drawing on framing theory to identify dominant frames in media messaging and synthesize cross-cultural factors that impact how the issue is addressed. The findings note that sex trafficking coverage is often framed through isolated incidents, stereotypes, and crime-focused lenses, restricting audience understanding of human trafficking. These shortcomings are then confronted by advocating for reframing remedies that provide nuance and increase awareness. Supplemental insights from personal communications with anti-trafficking organizations in Thailand further convey effective strategies for public communication on human trafficking issues. Findings from this analysis support the recommendation that media institutions must adopt more diverse framing approaches to enhance human trafficking visibility and address its systemic roots.

About the Author

Stefanie Henriques earned her bachelor’s degree in Media Production & Management with a minor in Legal Studies from the University of Central Florida. She presented her research at the Florida Communication Association’s 2025 convention and was recognized for her anti-trafficking efforts at the 2026 Polaris Star Awards. Stefanie will continue her studies at Washington University School of Law, where she hopes to further examine the intersectionality of media and law. 

Share

COinS
 

Accessibility Statement

This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.