Alternative Title

Understanding the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Divide: Comparing Faculty and Student Perceptions of Generative AI (GenAI)

Contributor

University of Central Florida. Faculty Center for Teaching and Learning; University of Central Florida. Division of Digital Learning; Teaching and Learning with AI Conference (2025 : Orlando, Fla.)

Location

Seminole A

Start Date

29-5-2025 12:00 PM

End Date

29-5-2025 12:25 PM

Publisher

University of Central Florida Libraries

Keywords:

Generative AI; Faculty perceptions; Student attitudes; Academic integrity; Technology in education

Subjects

Artificial intelligence--Study and teaching (Higher); Artificial intelligence--Educational applications; Students--Attitudes--Research; Universities and colleges--Faculty--Attitudes; Artificial intelligence--Moral and ethical aspects

Description

As GenAI reshapes the workforce, a significant disconnect in higher education has been identified. Researchers from the Research Initiative for Teaching Effectiveness at the University of Central Florida surveyed faculty (N=260) and students (N=677) finding that while half of students view AI skills as crucial for their future careers, fewer than one-third of faculty actively teach with AI or encourage its use. Despite differing perspectives on AI integration, both groups share a common concern: the risk of cheating and plagiarism. Our analysis reveals critical insights into the challenges of balancing technological innovation with academic integrity in an AI-driven educational landscape

Language

eng

Type

Presentation

Format

application/pdf

Rights Statement

All Rights Reserved

Audience

Faculty; Students

Share

COinS
 
May 29th, 12:00 PM May 29th, 12:25 PM

Understanding the AI Divide: Comparing Faculty and Student Perceptions of Generative AI

Seminole A

As GenAI reshapes the workforce, a significant disconnect in higher education has been identified. Researchers from the Research Initiative for Teaching Effectiveness at the University of Central Florida surveyed faculty (N=260) and students (N=677) finding that while half of students view AI skills as crucial for their future careers, fewer than one-third of faculty actively teach with AI or encourage its use. Despite differing perspectives on AI integration, both groups share a common concern: the risk of cheating and plagiarism. Our analysis reveals critical insights into the challenges of balancing technological innovation with academic integrity in an AI-driven educational landscape